Abstract:
ABSTRACT
Credit unions known as savings and credit cooperatives societies in Kenya are
important in financial sector in credit access, savings and economic development. In the
year 2008, Kenya government introduced SACCO Society Regulatory Authority
(SASRA) regulation’s to monitor SACCOs sector after continued problems of poor
management, misuse of members’ savings and poor financial performance. Since then
some SACCOs have adopted these regulations and licensed. However these SACCOs
have faced implementation challenges and the effect of adopting these regulations on
financial performance in the context of Nyandarua County is not known. This research
sought to establish the effect of SASRA regulations and regulatory challenges on
financial performance of SACCOs in Nyandarua County. Three objectives; To examine
the effect of SASRA regulations on financial performance of SASRA registered
SACCOs in Nyandarua County, to establish the effect of regulatory challenges on the
relationship between SASRA regulations and financial performance of SASRA licensed
SACCOs in Nyandarua County and to establish the joint effect of the regulatory
challenges and SASRA regulations on financial performance of these SASRA licensed
SACCOs were considered. Three theories; agency theory, trade off theory and
stakeholders’ theory were used to study the problem under investigation. A census of 5
SASRA licensed SACCOs in Nyandarua County was done. Descriptive research design
was used because the researcher wanted to know the current position of SACCOs after
SASRA regulations. Questionnaires collected primary data while data collection sheet
collected secondary data from annual financial statements three years prior and after
licensing whereby data on financial performance inform of key financial performance
ratios were calculated. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in data analysis
whereby correlation, regression and ANOVA were done. Multiple regression was used
to analyse relationship between the variables while t-test tested the hypotheses. The
analysis showed that SACCOs adopted SASRA regulations and maintained the
minimum core capital although capital adequacy requirement improved with
challenges. SACCOs fully complied with the SASRA regulations and the correlation
result showed SASRA regulations slightly improved financial performance of the
SACCOs as measured by ROA. Similarly, the R² statistic provided a 4.1% of the total
variance of the challenges faced by the SACCOs as explained by SASRA regulations.
On the overall, the study found SASRA regulations and financial performance with a
non-significant correlation with ROA at 99% level of confidence. This may be due to
the fact that SASRA regulations implementation is at initial stages and also the cost
associated with SASRA regulations compliance and licensing. Analysis of variance
indicated that there were no significant differences between the SASRA regulations,
challenges and ROA F = 0.034, P = 0.967; p > 0.05. The study thus did not reject the
null hypothesis. These findings may be useful to managers and other stakeholders of
SACCOs in considering licensing by SASRA and its challenges on financial
performance.